Database Handicapping Software- JCapper

JCapper Message Board

          General Discussion
                      -- Stronach Tracks - Boycott

Home Register
Log In
By Stronach Tracks - Boycott
parshooter
6/9/2017
5:40:36 PM
Currently Derby Wars and Horsetourneys lost a legal battle with Frank Stronach and those contest sites are not allowed to use all Stronach tracks for their contests.
If he doesn't want contests he loses my wagering on his tracks.
Just wondering if any others felt the same
To my knowledge his tracks are GPX-SAX-LRL-GGX
I may have missed some.
Thoughts?

Reply
jeff
6/12/2017
10:59:50 AM
There are plenty of other tracks out there and Derby Wars is still offering tournaments. (Just not on Stronach content.)

The thing that kills me is NO ONE at The Stronach Group, CDI, or any of the independent thoroughbred tracks for that matter seems willing to innovate - in ANY area.

EDIT: I take that back. Oaklawn did try reduced vig for their on track show pools this past meet. (That's something at least.)


That said, the only entities in thoroughbred racing doing any real innovating are:

Sites like Derby Wars -- tournaments, always trying new tournament formats, reduced rake vs. the parimutuels, etc.

ADWs -- if your handle volume is high enough many offer cash rebates and free past performance info. Even at min volume thresholds most offer improved wagering interfaces vs. the old school standard wager pad which allows for rapid ticket construction. Most now offer other perks like text file upload and free race replays, etc.

Data Vendors -- HDW, DRF, Brisnet, etc. have been quite willing to innovate. (Some more than others.) I can't even count many different things and special processes HDW has put in place over the years at my request. Even Equibase has gotten in on the act. (The Scratches and Changes XML feed is just one example.)

But The Stronach Group?... CDI?... Innovate?

Umm... That'd be a big fat no.

What kills me is that The Stronach Group, CDI, and let's not forget HORSEMEN...

Instead of innovating:

They have made a concerted effort to thwart innovation and clamp down on sites like Derby Wars, ADWs, and yes even Data Providers like HDW.

Of course when they win in court (like the recent Derby Wars case) they get a "victory" they can point to.

But at what cost?

While it's clear from their actions that The Stronach Group and CDI think sites like Derby Wars and ADWs (not theirs of course but independently owned ADWs) are BAD for racing and need to have their content pulled, be charged higher rates, and/or be shut down...

I would argue that BECAUSE sites like Derby Wars and independently owned ADWs are the only ones innovating:

They -- and not the tracks -- have had the effect of actually creating interest and drawing eyeballs to the product among us fans and bettors.

In my opinion each and every "victory" like the recent Derby Wars case only serves to create badwill among the customer base:

And in turn has the effect of causing us bettors to collectively lose interest in thoroughbred racing and BET LESS than we were betting before.

North American thoroughbred racing handle peaked at just under $16 billion in 2003. And it's been shrinking at the rate of about 4% per year ever since. 2017 should come in somewhere between $10b and $11b.

Unadjusted for inflation that's a 33% loss.

Adjusted for inflation that's about a 50% loss.

So far as a boycott...

I say use your handle dollars to vote your conscience. (I know I do.)

So far as an organized boycott...

I'm not sure it would have the desired effect.

Adjusted for inflation: Racing has already undergone a 50% handle loss.

The market is speaking.

The question is:

Is anyone at The Stronach Group or CDI listening?



-jp

.



~Edited by: jeff  on:  6/12/2017  at:  10:59:50 AM~

Reply
parshooter
6/13/2017
8:02:49 PM
Excellent points Jeff. Have to completely agree.
At this time Derby Wars say they are negotiating with Stronach tracks. Also with Belmont.

Reply
jeff
6/30/2017
6:58:07 PM
An update...

bloodhorse.com article by Frank Angst | June 30th 2017
Several Tracks Reach Deals With Contest Site Derby Wars:
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/222343/several-tracks-reach-deals-with-contest-site-derby-wars


--quote:
"Horse racing contest site DerbyWars.com announced June 30 it reached partnership agreements with several tracks and racing associations that will allow the site to use those racing signals as part of its handicapping contests.

The agreement comes just over two weeks after Derby Wars owner Horse Racing Labs agreed to pay The Stronach Group at least $500,000 to resolve a lawsuit brought against the contest site, which had used signals from Stronach-owned tracks without permission or compensation.

On Friday Derby Wars said partnership agreements were reached with New York Racing Association, Monmouth Park, Meadowlands, Ellis Park, Kentucky Downs, Louisiana Downs, and Fairmount Park. The agreements include revenue-sharing with the tracks and horsemen for use of their races in contests at DerbyWars.com, as well as video and data sharing opportunities to enhance customer experience."
--end quote



-jp

.

Reply
Reply

Copyright 2008 JCapper Software              back to the JCapper Message Board              www.JCapper.com