I purposely have the Data Window programmed to break such races out separately on line 11 as *Other.
Someone could probably make an argument to include the "MO" races on the same line as the "M" races. (Are these races close enough class level-wise and field makeup-wise that I should maybe make a change to the Data Window programming and list them there?)
Running a query limited to just "MO" races at all tracks everywhere since Jan 01 2012 through yesterday Mon Nov 11 2013 enables me to compile the following table:
********************** TRACK RACES ********************** EMD 17 HOO 23 HST 60 IND 61 TUP 120 ********************** TOTAL 281 **********************
FYI, During that same time frame I have approximately 93k total races in the database. Those 281 "MO" races represent a tiny pct of the whole. The number of U races from futurity trials, etc. even smaller.
After typing that out and re-reading it...
I'm leaning in the direction of not making a change... that listing these races out separately in the Data Window on line 11 as *Other is probably (still) the right way to handle things.
More to come...
-jp
.
~Edited by: jeff on: 11/12/2013 at: 6:51:10 PM~
|