Database Handicapping Software- JCapper

JCapper Message Board

          JCapper 101
                      -- Cherry Pick?

Home Register
Log In
By Cherry Pick?
Caveat
8/29/2012
5:26:19 PM

Hello All...

I have a UDM with these results....
I got advise to not cherry pick the successful tracks..

Should I weed out the bad results?


code:
 ****************************************************************************************
BY TRACK sorted by Win ROI Run Date: 8/29/2012 6:20:16 PM
****************************************************************************************
WIN WIN WIN PLACE PLACE
TRACK PLAYS WINS PCT IMPACT ROI PLACES PCT ROI
****************************************************************************************
DEL 5 1 0.2 0.9046 4.84 2 0.4 1.88
NPX 15 5 0.3333 1.5076 3.9033 5 0.3333 1.2733
APX 14 3 0.2143 0.9693 3.4357 4 0.2857 1.45
FLX 31 6 0.1935 0.8752 3.3274 9 0.2903 1.3726
LSX 1 1 1 4.5232 3.3 1 1 2.6
ELP 10 2 0.2 0.9046 3.24 5 0.5 1.85
CDX 1 1 1 4.5232 3 1 1 1.9
IND 4 2 0.5 2.2616 2.95 2 0.5 0.875
WOX 21 5 0.2381 1.077 2.7905 10 0.4762 3.1167
FEX 16 6 0.375 1.6962 2.6688 9 0.5625 1.9344
FAR 3 1 0.3333 1.5076 2.3333 1 0.3333 1.3
SUF 26 9 0.3462 1.5659 2.1692 9 0.3462 1.0692
FMT 10 3 0.3 1.357 2 5 0.5 0.94
PRM 23 10 0.4348 1.9667 1.8522 13 0.5652 1.2609
LAD 30 5 0.1667 0.754 1.7433 9 0.3 1.15
PLN 8 2 0.25 1.1308 1.6375 4 0.5 1.1625
HOL 3 1 0.3333 1.5076 1.6 2 0.6667 1.7333
CPW 1 1 1 4.5232 1.6 1 1 2.2
PID 31 8 0.2581 1.1674 1.4871 13 0.4194 1.2968
CLS 12 4 0.3333 1.5076 1.4583 4 0.3333 0.6833
RUI 7 3 0.4286 1.9386 1.2857 5 0.7143 1.9571
ALB 4 1 0.25 1.1308 1.225 1 0.25 0.75
MNR 29 7 0.2414 1.0919 1.2034 11 0.3793 0.8207
HST 15 4 0.2667 1.2063 1.19 7 0.4667 1.2967
EMD 12 4 0.3333 1.5076 1.1083 4 0.3333 0.625
ARP 8 2 0.25 1.1308 1.0375 4 0.5 1.2875
MDX 7 3 0.4286 1.9386 1.0143 4 0.5714 1.2429
EVD 32 6 0.1875 0.8481 1.0125 13 0.4063 1.0813



CRC 26 4 0.1538 0.6957 0.9885 6 0.2308 0.6154
FPK 17 3 0.1765 0.7983 0.9882 5 0.2941 0.7765
PHA 29 8 0.2759 1.2479 0.8966 12 0.4138 0.8897
SAR 12 1 0.0833 0.3768 0.8417 2 0.1667 0.5542
CBY 13 5 0.3846 1.7396 0.7462 5 0.3846 0.5077
CTX 30 5 0.1667 0.754 0.7333 13 0.4333 0.84
ASD 15 2 0.1333 0.6029 0.6733 4 0.2667 1.2567
HOO 16 2 0.125 0.5654 0.6688 4 0.25 0.7188
RDX 21 4 0.1905 0.8617 0.581 6 0.2857 0.5667
PEN 28 4 0.1429 0.6464 0.5071 7 0.25 0.6071
TDN 15 3 0.2 0.9046 0.4 5 0.3333 0.7667
RPX 4 1 0.25 1.1308 0.35 2 0.5 0.575
DMR 22 2 0.0909 0.4112 0.2 5 0.2273 0.5227
MTH 15 1 0.0667 0.3017 0.1533 3 0.2 0.62
SRX 11 0 0 0 0 2 0.1818 0.4909
SAC 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BEL 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BOI 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GRP 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1.9
CNL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GGX 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MPM 7 0 0 0 0 2 0.2857 0.5857
LNN 4 0 0 0 0 2 0.5 0.875
LAX 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GPR 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GIL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PMX 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
****************************************************************************************
55 Track Codes from file: C:\2012_3RD_QTR\pL_profile.txt
****************************************************************************************

code:





Mike

Reply
Charli125
8/29/2012
5:54:51 PM
Mike,

I'd try looking at a larger subsection first. Those results are over a very small time period, so I wouldn't trust them. Try running it over another quarter and see what happens. If the results are the same, you might have something.

I wouldn't be too quick to chop off tracks unless you verify that they're consistently good/bad.

Reply
Caveat
8/29/2012
6:07:14 PM


thxs Charlie..

this waiting is killing me..LOL

Mike

Reply
Windoor
9/3/2012
10:42:48 AM
I have some UDM's (spot plays) that are very dependent on track and "time of year".

That is, I can find consistent results from one year to the next for the same time period and track.

A play that works very well for me in the fall (4th quarter) does not produce good results in the spring or at some other tracks.

I am still researching this, but so far, it appears to be valid. A lot of plays I had given up on, are now back it the loop to try again at the same track and in the same time period.

I am even considering that a rather warm winter compared to a colder one might play a role at some tracks, as in changing track variants. Knowing (or at least a good guess) of "today's" surface/track variant can greatly increase the win percent.

While some horses can show better speed, they can easily lose to a stronger horse with more stamina over a tiring track. Or so I believe.

That's why I think three years of data should be the minimum you look at, before drawing any conclusions. Anything that can help predict today's surface is sure to be a plus.

Regards,

Windoor





Reply
Charli125
9/4/2012
5:18:34 PM
I too have a couple of UDM's that only work for certain months. I have a Q1 UDM that's consistently good over the last 3 years, but only for Jan-Mar.

Reply
Caveat
9/5/2012
7:20:22 AM
Thxs gentlemen...

I'll take note and wont delete them when they go south for the winter ;)

mike

Reply
CLDavisMD
9/12/2012
3:36:36 PM
Some tracks that run all year do significant track maintenance in the spring and fall, which is a possible reason why some UDMs work at certain times of the year and not at others.

Reply
ArlJim78
9/19/2012
8:34:38 PM
I used to do a lot of track filtering, but I've gotten away from it. Some of the tracks showing poor results in the list posted here, might over the next year show big positive results. If the UDM generates a lot of plays then I might filter out some tracks based on a year or two worth of data. but in general I like to keep the UDMs as open as possible in terms of the tracks. I find it more robust, less likely to spike up and down

Reply
ArlJim78
9/19/2012
8:35:53 PM
Oh my, taking another look at the data posted I would say it's way to early to even consider filtering by track. not enough plays.

Reply
Reply

Copyright © 2018 JCapper Software              back to the JCapper Message Board              www.JCapper.com